Aggregate reports
Cross-operator analysis of how redemption actually behaves — first against repeat, method against method, published against observed. Reports appear here only when there is enough evidence to support them.
No reports are published yet
0 moderated redemption observations are currently on record. A cross-operator report needs considerably more than that, and publishing one now would describe our sample rather than the industry.
This page will stay empty until the evidence supports something worth saying. An empty reports page is an accurate description of the current state of the dataset; a page of charts built on a handful of observations would not be.
What a report will require
- At least 5 verified observations for every segment shown, and 12 before a segment is presented without a small-sample caveat.
- Methods and currencies reported separately, never pooled.
- First and repeat redemptions separated wherever the data supports the split.
- Medians and ranges rather than means, with outliers flagged and retained.
- The observation window stated on every figure, so a reader can see whether it describes last month or last year.
- An explicit statement of what the sample does not represent. Observations arrive from people who chose to submit them, which is not a random sample of redemptions, and no report here will claim otherwise.
What will not appear here
No operator league table, no composite score, no “fastest paying casino” ranking. Those require a confidence about relative performance that observational data submitted voluntarily cannot support, and they would be read as recommendations regardless of how they were captioned.
Per-operator published and observed timings · How aggregation works